Why photography isnt art

My final point is as follows. Painters have constant control over the details of the subject and over their creation as a whole. They can give the painting a particular impression or yield a particular facial expression from a person, and they can change all these things before and during their creation. A photographer does not possess this power, a photograph has to capture the moment as it actually was, and the photographer has no control over any details.

A photographer captures a moment, he can never create the moment, logically speaking. There are several minor points that I would like to write about so as to deal with anticipated objections before I actually receive them, in the way a mindful philosopher does. I will instead skirt these issues for now lest this essay becomes too long and inaccessible and — if truth be told — anyone will even raise them at all.

So there we are. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Search for: Search. Date: July 29, Author: philosophicalnarratives 0 Comments. Share this: Twitter Facebook. Few are making photos with chemicals anymore, but billions make legible photographs with the click of a button.

Still, as was the case years ago, the art is in the eye, not the device. JSTOR is a digital library for scholars, researchers, and students.

Privacy Policy Contact Us You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking on the provided link on any marketing message. Pine forrest [sic], Summit Station, Catawissa R. By: Jordan G. February 6, June 7, Share Tweet Email Print. Photography was invented in the s and though it remained a fledgling technology in the few decades thereafter, many artists and art critics still saw it as a threat, as the artist Henrietta Clopath voiced in a issue of Brush and Pencil : The fear has sometimes been expressed that photography would in time entirely supersede the art of painting.

Have a correction or comment about this article? Please contact us. What type of art is photography? The answers are as limitless as with any other medium. Just as a painter uses paint, a brush, and a canvas, the photography uses a camera and film as their tools.

Is photography art? Another time-tested argument against an affirmative answer has to do with replication. This argument posits that since photographs can be replicated infinitely, their artistic value is inherently lower than a traditional work of art, such as a painting, that was made by hand and exists as a one-of-a-kind piece. Copies and prints can be made of a painting, but the original painting remains a singular work of art elevated above all subsequent copies.

Some detractors answer the question is photography a form of art on a conditional basis. There are people who assert that a still photograph is never art, while there are others who assert that photography is considered art under the right circumstances, but that not every photograph taken is automatically considered a work of art.

Acclaimed visual artist Roger Ballen holds a complicated view on is photography art? He believes there is an important distinction between a photographer and an artist who uses photography as their medium. It is plain to see that a carefully composed , exposed , focused , and captured image has inherent artistic value.

Photography, as a medium, can shade reality with new context and meaning. Messages and symbolism can be conveyed through the presentation of a still image. The juxtaposition of visual elements can take on new value when frozen in time as a photograph. All of the near-infinite photographic variables and possibilities make it clear that photography is artistic.

The manipulation of different camera types as tools, and of the visual subject as a canvas make for endless photographic potential. The first cameras in history maybe have been used more for the purposes of documentation rather than art, but it was not long before the artistic potential of the camera was first explored. Drawing, painting, and sculpting existed as art forms for thousands of years before the invention of the camera. These days, the general consensus is that photography is, in fact, an art form.

For tips on taking artistic photographs, check out the video below. More So than with photography, a debate continues as to whether or not filmmaking is artistic. Of course filmmaking is art! If you believe that filmmaking and photography are art forms, then we have numerous articles that can help further your understanding and appreciation of these creative mediums. Is photography considered an art form?

The most important piece of technology when working as a photographer or a videographer is the camera. There are many different types and models of cameras on the market these days. Telling them apart and, more importantly, knowing which one to choose for your own projects can be a challenge.

Our camera guide can bring you up to speed on the different types of cameras available to you.